Ranking Call of Duty's Worst Calls in 2025

Few gaming franchises can ignite as much passion, excitement, and, let's be honest, sheer frustration as Call of Duty. With a legacy spanning decades and countless iterations, the series has delivered some of the highest highs in first-person shooter history. But with that long history comes a scrapbook of questionable decisions and controversial updates. As we navigate 2025, the community continues to debate the missteps that left players scratching their heads. In this retrospective, we're diving into what many fans consider the contenders for the Call of Duty: Mobile top 20 worst call list, drawing from sentiments across the entire franchise.

The Never-Ending Movement Debate

Ah, the great movement debate. It's a ghost that has haunted the franchise for years, swinging the pendulum between tactical, boots-on-the-ground combat and hyper-kinetic, aerial acrobatics. One of the most persistent complaints, bubbling up again with the release of Black Ops 6, is the prevalence of players "jumping around like rabbits," as one frustrated veteran put it. This style, which some feel lowers the skill gap and detracts from tactical positioning, is a constant source of friction. The "worst call" here isn't a single feature, but the ongoing identity crisis of how a soldier should move on the battlefield. Is it a grounded shooter or a physics-defying arena? The community remains fiercely divided.

Weapon Balancing Woes: The ADS Crisis

There's no feeling quite like having your favorite weapon nerfed into oblivion. A prime example that has players fuming is the issue of Aim Down Sights (ADS) speed. Imagine your trusty AK-47, a reliable friend through countless matches, suddenly feeling like it's been given a pair of concrete shoes. Players have lamented that certain assault rifles in recent titles take an eternity to aim, rendering them useless in the fast-paced engagements that define Call of Duty. This kind of heavy-handed balancing can feel like a betrayal, turning a beloved gun into a glorified paperweight overnight. It's a baffling decision that can single-handedly kill the entire feel of the game for many. 😥

Contentious Map Design: From Camp-Fests to Crucibles

A map can be a strategic masterpiece or a source of endless migraines. Lately, the design philosophy has been a major point of contention. On one hand, players have grown tired of what they call "campy maps"—layouts with an overabundance of windows, doors, and hiding spots that encourage a passive, slow-paced playstyle. It's a design choice that punishes aggressive players and can grind a match to a halt.

On the other extreme, you have high-stakes, high-pressure arenas like the infamous Gulag from Caldera's mines. This little three-lane prison was a cruel crucible where your entire match hung in the balance of a single 1v1 duel. Man, talk about pressure! While a novel idea, for many, losing a 20-minute game based on a random loadout in a tiny shack felt like one of the worst calls imaginable.

The Problem with Crossover Features

With the massive success of Warzone, there's been a clear push to homogenize the Call of Duty experience. However, this has led to some awkward implementations. A frequent complaint is the porting of Warzone-specific mechanics and aesthetics into the traditional multiplayer modes. For instance, players have pointed to the "War zone trash" red dot sight as an example of a feature that just doesn't feel right in a 6v6 environment. What works for long-range engagements on a massive island doesn't always translate to the tight, reflex-based combat of a map like Shipment or Nuketown. It's a classic case of a 'one size fits all' solution that, well, fits no one perfectly.

To summarize some of the most debated "worst calls":

• Movement Mechanics: The constant shift between boots-on-the-ground and advanced movement.

• Weapon Tuning: Drastic changes to ADS speed and recoil that make guns feel inconsistent.

• Map Philosophy: A swing between overly campy designs and unfairly punishing mini-arenas.

• Feature Creep: Forcing elements from one game mode (like Warzone) into another.

• Community Toxicity: The rise of public "worst of" lists that sour the community atmosphere, a problem even seen in dedicated Call of Duty: Mobile groups.

Ultimately, what defines a "worst call" is subjective, but these issues represent a significant portion of the community's frustrations. The passion behind these complaints shows just how much players care about the franchise's direction. The big question is, will the developers take this feedback to heart for the next generation of content? Only time will tell. 🤔